The Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review for Leiland-James Michael Corkill was produced today. It consists of three pages, NO MORE, and two of those pages hold the actions deemed necessary to prevent future actions of the Social Workers allowing anything like this to happen again. No Apology to that grief-stricken mother. Absolutely no admission of Guilt on the part of that so-called Social Working Team who snatched that infant from his mother’s bedside! Not even the term “SORRY”. No words stating the correctness of the Social Workers who removed that tiny infant from his mother’s side as she lay in the maternity ward. They snatched that infant because IN THEIR BLOODY OPINION, her prior association with a brutal ex-partner produced worry which confirmed that she could not cope with a new-born baby, SO THEY TOOK THAT TINY INFANT, AND CONDEMNED HIM TO DEATH BY LEAVING HIM WITH A WOMAN WHO MURDERED HIM A YEAR LATER!
You need to understand that Social Work as a profession is not as it once (long ago) was, staffed by down-to-earth, middle-aged ladies post raising their own families, grounded, experienced and realistic enough to see, and actually help those with problems.
ReplyDeleteIt was the first to be taken over during the “Long March through the Institutions”. For decades, it has not just been that you must be an extreme leftist to be promoted, or even to get employed. It is that you must demonstrate this to even gain access to the training to ‘become’ a Social Worker. A social work qualification is not just an indicator, but proof that the recipient is the most extreme ideologue imaginable (and in any sane world a document that would lead directly to a firing-squad).
I’ve had both, as a father, personal and, as a nurse, professional contact with Cumbria Social Services (CAFCASS – otherwise known as the Cumbria Lesbian Women’s Support Service) and … you can’t even imagine (despite this story) how bad they really are.
They are all extremely left-wing. The vast majority are blatant, extreme misandrist lesbians (the one, and only, male is, predictably, gay).
In their views, no woman is to be judged in the wrong in any sense or form (any woman, even an alcoholic, drug-addled, psychotic is still better than any man), thus judgements are based, not on them or what is best for the child (children are merely a woman’s ‘property’), but what their opinion is of any males the woman has contact with.
Thus, as we see here, the birth mother, with a history of contact with ‘bad’ men is ‘unworthy’, and the murderer, having only ‘nice’ (by definition, either fellow leftists or gay) males, ‘ideal’. Seriously, they really do work this way, and cheerfully state such conclusions publicly (and in court).
My personal experience resulted in my taking the matter to a County Council tribunal. I proved the social workers involved were (criminally) corrupt, biased, incompetent and had shown wilful malfeasance. The Tribunal found that I had proven, beyond doubt, all my claims and … then did nothing. The social workers involved … (you can’t make this up) promoted. (The intentional delays meant that post 'win' I no longer was allowed to take it to the Ombudsman either - deliberately).
Here? Despite the demonstrable (deliberate, intentional, systemic) failures shown. Unless, and until the social workers involved are ‘personally’ brought to a public trial, nothing whatsoever will happen to them (other than probably being promoted). Fact!
And, as always, we’ll hear of yet another identical case in a year or so.
"We’ll hear of yet another identical case in a year or so." Surely not. Lessons will be learned!
Delete