The only real media today

There are a number of ways to come at this.  We could start with Julian Assange:

https://undergroundnewswire.news/2022/04/04/julian-assanges-lawyer-reveals-new-information-on-what-is-happening-to-him-in-prison-and-its-shocking/

The co-founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, is to remain in prison even after his term ends due to his “history of absconding,” as reported by a judge. He is “crumbling” psychologically and physically, as Chris Hedges reports.

Hedges attended Julian Assange’s wedding to his partner Stella Moris at London’s Belmarsh prison. Assange has been behind bars for nearly three years awaiting possible extradition to the United States on espionage charges for publishing documents revealing war crimes committed in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Hedges says Assange exposed the “most important information” of this generation, along with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Getting good copy out to readers is the prime directive of the media in a supposedly free country but there's a lot of 'backdoor-ery' going on preventing us from getting copy out, even this morning.  At another site where I write:

Truth is the first casualty

The 'can't connect'  notice

On all the Southfront links in this post, such a notice came up when I tried to access them [there was no site at the end of their links].  

One thing you can be sure of is that I did not do that myself, quite the opposite, I want them accessible to view.

Our poster IYE wrote:

We go over, under, round or through when presented with obstacles. :)

Run the links which are being blocked through wayback. Some of them show up there like this one. No gore as far as I've seen. Destroyed buildings and machinery. Not all images show up on wayback but the text does.

How to use wayback/web archive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q47UQ2LR7nE

Further down there is the opposite tactic of letting things through deliberately:

This is where a known globocabalist organisation allows content to stand and let's say one of our warriors picks up on it and runs with it. Sounds eminently reasonable upfront.

If they are letting that content through though, then there's something quite iffy about it.  The censorship myrmidons are legion, they're all over every piece of content.  If it's deemed acceptable to them, then by definition, there's something very wrong.

I know there are also issues with Rumble and Bitchute, all of this is just another front in the ongoing war, but readers/watchers do need to be aware that something from Reuters/Bloomberg/FT/Newsweek then appearing on YT, then appearing in alt media, is ultra-suss until laboriously checked out.

Also, these vloggers drone on and on for hours, saying little.

Perhaps that's the strategy - running seemingly red-pilled guys who look the part, dozens of em drone on and on, they're never censored, they're even recommended ... and what is the net result?

Hours and hours on our part sifting through something we could have done in five minutes in print.  Think on't, good reader.  Vlogs are an indulgence for those who enjoy the content, e.g. films, sports replays, music ... but for anything news, a vlog is not your go-to medium. Printed word is.

Now, if you eliminate MSM TV and radio [the worst is talkback radio for veracity], plus online 'news such as the Guardian through to the Mail, slaves to globocabal, you're left with soc-med which is wild west.

True, there is Twitter and FB, slaves to globocabal but there's a good one in Gab.  Gettr is compromised, as is Newsmax, Fox is a joke.  Sky Aus is occasionally ok [depends who you get, not even Bolt is sound, whereas Jo Nova is.]

Downside of blogs is they're highly individual in angle but that can be a good thing too - at least you know the line you're getting.  Eventually, blogs do not encourage clashes between diametrically opposed views as it's pointless and they do tend to take a line.  Ours here is for liberty and anti Wokery but the Catch 22 is that if the admin is full on libertarian, then everything is tolerated, inc. globotrolling, which descends into ad hominem slanging and the prime directive of the blog is lost.  Which was the purpose of the trolling in the first place.

There is also the posing of globocontrolled opposition ... Breitbart has gone that way, easily seen in parroting the Uniparty line.

With the MSM in deep globocaptcha, the obvious battleground is soc-med.  Just look at this:

Chilling indeed.  But don't forget, it's not just the official myrmidons doing this, the Cressida Dicks and Dorries, it's every Woke troll in a comments thread who tries to wreck what that blogger is trying to get out to the readers.

And blogs are very much now the battlegound.