What I'm referring to here is something you can carry with you - a slip of paper, maybe reprised in something on your smartphone - something you can quickly hand to a mask-Karen or a lockdown-zealot who accosts you in public.
Notes
Anyone in the other 'camp' is going to be hardwired for a variety of reasons:
1. The constant drip-drip-drip in the MSM of propaganda references to 'anti-vaxxers', 'nutters' etc. is the same that Farage and UKIP were called, same that Brexiteers were called, same that TBP was called, same that common garden Christians are called [as distinct from pointy-hatted Pope/Welby Big Church types, same that Marjorie Taylor Greene and Josh Hawley are being called.
Also the same that Big Church Scientists such as Fauci, Ferguson, Royal Society, Michael Mann and his hockey stick, Kyoto, NPCC called any who dared disagree with them with facts and figures, e.g. Anthony Watt.
These are highly organised people, these propagandists [see Senator William Jenner's comments, Feb 1954] and they are certainly going to ride roughshod over the top of any who dare try to stand in the way.
In fact, this is the essence of war - yes, we ARE at war, ladies and gentlemen, in case it's escaped anyone's notice. The second sticking point perhaps. The first sticking point is any demographic quoted above on 'our' side, which you do not personally wish to see bundled in with the others. Nuff said on that for now.
2. The 'responsible' citizen. He's told by the 'leaders' via the MSM that 'we all have to chip in, chaps, chop-chop, let's get on with it, ra ra ra, rally around the flag', 'care for your nation, get the jab' ... and yet it's a scam he and his wife and children are being sucked into. We have more than shown at our sites that there is more than reasonable doubt which should give everyone across the country pause.
It's seen as 'manly' or 'responsible' to throw off all reasoning, all ferreting and uncritically jump onboard. Like lemmings in that old myth.
And we're seeing the result of this now across two nations either side of the pond, plus the wider world.
These are responsible people, good people deep down - they could be your mother and father, grandparents, brought up as a time when people rolled up their sleeves and 'got on with it'.
The maddening thing is that this is precisely our own rhetoric which they have hijacked and flung back at us, only now it's twisted into supporting an unsustainable position. I think we can call people's adverse reactions to the poison, plus the covered up deaths, as 'evil', plus the falsified and non sequitur data, let's not squabble over a word.
3. Blackmail - without having it, you lose your job.
Developing an effective 'vaccine' against the vaccinators
This is the bottom line, innit? How to counter a concerted campaign many years in the planning? One which was always going to take out the susceptible first.
Always bearing in mind that we are dealing with the hardwired, in many cases newly hardwired - fanatics in fact - Yuri Bezmenov addressed this in the mid 80s when he spoke of de-moralisation.
He said that once the process is complete, no amount of 'factual information' as he put it, will get under the smug decision they've made that the bollox is the 'right choice'. Great effort is put into making people feel good about doing the wrong thing.
The sort of rationales they're trotting out are jawdropping. A mate of mine actually said to me that in his mother's case, it was probably better for her demographic to have it.
Whaaaa!? WT actual F?
That demographic is precisely the one to avoid it. And I thought he'd seen the light as a result of painstaking reading of various sites. Sheesh!
So, ladies and gentlemen, in the light of all the foregoing, what could we put on that slip of paper which we would attempt to hand a Karen or maybe just leave lying around?
Here are three possible urls:
http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/
Possibly wouldn't include these below at this stage - maybe one step too far right now, include them in the second batch, so to speak, a battery of urls:
https://nationalfile.com/report-pfizer-vaccine-confirmed-to-cause-neurodegenerative-diseases/
Open to discussion here on which urls to include on that slip of paper, that would not immediately overload and more importantly, would not FORCE the person to listen there and then.
Far better they glance later if they so wish, we need to lay off with the hard sell.
I fear you are way too optimistic.
ReplyDeleteNothing, literally nothing, you say or can provide information wise will sway the average karen. Remember these are the self-same people who will have (and still do) hold extreme negative views about childhood vaccinations. The cognitive dissonance must be staggering, yet is indicative that this has become (yet another) ‘item of faith’ in the religion of wokeness.
Masks, vaccinations and the attendant passports are ways in which they can openly proclaim and demonstrate their ‘virtue’ and superiority over the unwashed. Facts are not only irrelevant to them, but seen as an attack on them – witness the white-washing, restriction and banning of any real facts as ’hate speech’.
Most people though are already beginning to doubt (in my local area there are a very few karens who celebrate their compliance, most though reluctantly, and apparently with growing disgust, comply only when they absolutely must – when forced to do so), those could benefit from some ‘ammunition’ against the constant propaganda … if you could get it disseminated widely enough (good luck with that).
I'd recommend a précis of Underdogsbiteupwards posts on the topics as both informed (as a subject expert) and simple enough (in phrasing and illustration) for the average person. I only say that as I've done just that myself with a number of people who express the fact they actually understood the situation better as a consequence.