As has been demonstrated o’er and o’er and as many go-getting men will attest … behind every successful man or even one just with a mission, the quality of the woman is everything.
If she’s ambitious for him and for her own place in the sun, e.g. the WEFer wife of DeSantis, she in fact holds him back by her raw, scathing ambition … she would say it’s in his mind, he feels has his own masculinity to fulfil, constantly reminded by her.
To my mind, any man all for himself, any woman all for herself, is useless because there is no deep bond, just ongoing war at home, on the pillow, personal ambition. If a team though, with that deep understanding, then the “badder” one of them can lead the other astray, e.g. Bonny and Clyde.
The purpose of Melania beside the Donald in public, the purpose of Susie Wiles in the WH … is that the man is the blaster-through, the muscle, the woman observes, notes, never forgets, is the real gatekeeper … and if her aim is noble … then good things result. She is a stone wall though … implacable … good thing too. She wants him as a rock, he needs her steadiness and constancy … see Pam Bondi.
In a full on battle between other males and her, guess who wins?
“The ‘ice maiden’ at the heart of the Trump administration has won her first big battle this week — denying Elon Musk a permanent base in the West Wing of the White House.” The Times: https://thetimes.com/article/1a9c06
I’ve said since the dawn of time that women need to play to their strengths, not this other rubbish of this LA mayor or Merseyside feminazi or Hochul, Fani or whoever … women are not good when given ultimate power … ask any observer of the henpecked hubby and the dragon … it’s quite offputting and bad for her character too … that’s a monster, not a woman.
It’s a fine balance which needs maintaining … hellishly difficult, unless she wants it to work.
Trump may need to Sack Wiles as she's now trying to scupper Tulsi Gabbard and Robert Kennedy's confirmations. Trump needs 100% allegiance to his vision of an open administration. It appears that Wiles may not be so enthusiastic. And we know what happened during Trump Presidency v1.0 when he had people working against him inside the White House... Cast her aside and replace her with someone totally committed to the cause.
ReplyDeleteThis is a worry if so … whatever the feeling about Musk (room in the West Wing), Robert K Jnr, Tulsi … all of whom we’ve criticised for concrete reasons over the past year … the people did return MAGA-MAHA, not just MAGA … it was a definite selling point.
DeleteOthers we’ve criticised (and I say “we”, they’re reading this now and can confirm or deny) include Bondi and Bessent … now we might need to add Wiles.
Time might confirm Wiles, it might not … but to work actively against is not on.
There will be those blind followers of the god-emperor who will accept everything he lays before them including MAGA-MAHA. There will also be those who voted for him because he offered the least diabolical policies but not altogether happy with the choices he has made for his cabinet such as Gabbard and Kennedy. It is unrealistic to expect that all his choices and decisions will be unanimously accepted.
DeleteThe same thing occurs in the UK. Just because a party is voted in they assume the voters agree with every single one of their policies.
DeleteDoonhamer
Delete