Thursday, 3 October 2024

Let's play Superinjunction

In this game, girls and boys, the n1 rule is not to name, in comments, any of the parties we suspect are mentioned in a superinjunction anywhere in Britain. 

You'd understand that ggl comments are such that admins cannot edit them => therefore we must be vigilant, Julia and I, and simply not "unmoderate" any naming of names which could lead to recognition of the alleged miscreants.

The wildest aspect of this thing is that we may not even mention whose private life is being protected from scrutiny, what form of sexual inclination involved which people, even adult-minor, and we can't drop hints which leave no doubt ... no one said this was going to be a fun game this Thursday morn.

And what if we were not even sent a "desist" order?  Desist orders are generally for major MSM, esp. the now and then scurrilous ... wonder what happened to Rebekah Brooks anyway ... but if we breach a Superinjunction, in which no one knows that there even is one in place or for how long, nor are we MPs in parliament ...

... then to link the word Superinjunction to any public figure(s) whatever is a potential breach involving your nest egg or even years in the slammer.

Therefore, our admins here must be vigilant not to allow through any comment referring to any meathead whatever who might be up to hanky-panky ... sorry 'bout that.

4 comments:

  1. Nothing could be further from my mind than the linking of any name with any hypothetical Superinjunction. Moreover, my profound ignorance of celebrities and politicians etc prevents me from naming Captain Whatshisname, Madame Y, Sir Nobody, or Rear Admiral von K.
    In the event of any criminal prosecution, I demand to be tried by a jury of twelve red-bearded dwarves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've been close to one "D-notice" in the past, protecting someone from the press and also been close to someone else whose life was ruined by press intrusion into their private life. However, those were not public figures. Surely if public figures are living a lie, it is in the public interest to know. After all, if they were hiding something that they didn't want made public, wouldn't it make them more susceptible to blackmail? If that person were in government and the blackmailer was directing the government, shouldn't that be public knowledge? I suspect the cesspit that is Parliament will become more frenzied over the next couple of weeks. Think Liz Truss on steroids as all of this gets resolved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fear not. Sir Nobody will never get elected.

      Delete

Unburden yourself here: