Let me tell you how #AssistedDying will work in the UK once they push it through…
For the first year or so it will just be an option, you won’t hear much about it except in articles with headlines like “Assisted dying saved my parent/partner/child from years of pain”.
After a year or two a report will come out claiming success via some tortured invented statistical measure like “assisted dying boosts patient well being scores in surveyed NHS hospitals”.
Another will follow claiming waiting lists have improved due to decreased overcrowding in palliative care wards. They might even claim it’s decreased the NHS’s carbon footprint.
Opinion pieces will appear with titles like “Assisted dying success story shuts down conspiracy theorists”.
The minimum age to be considered for assisted dying will gradually be lowered. And the list of diseases and conditions for which assisted dying is a “recommended treatment alternative” will expand.
Eventually non-lethal diseases will be included, then psychological illnesses too.
Then will come an “emergency” - a fake one, obviously - and the NHS will come out of it shining thanks to resources “freed up” by euthanasia programs.
Next will come the editorials. “Assisted dying is good for patients and saved the NHS during [fake pandemic], it’s time to make it mandatory”.
A backbench MP will introduce a bill forcing anyone diagnosed with a fatal illness to be put on an assisted dying list.
The bill will fail, and most of the press will oppose it, but the government will issue “common sense” compromise regulations where assisted dying is the default, but patients can opt out of if they want.
It will never actually BE mandatory. But it WILL be harder and harder to get out of.
Patients who don’t want to sign DNRs or opt for end of life care will be branded “selfish” and “irresponsible”. Studies will claim they are a strain on the NHS resources.
Down the line, opting out will incur penalties to your pension payments and mean you are charged for healthcare, making it impossible for many older people to afford to stay alive.
Then they’ll start panels where patients who are “mentally incompetent” have assisted dying recommended by “mercy tribunals”.
…and the whole time the establishment will claim there is freedom of choice, and no slippery slope at all.
We're entering v dangerous territory - for folks generally. Unscrupulous Drs coupled with greedy relatives will have carte blanche to remove whomever they deem fit. And get away with it.
ReplyDeleteHere's a thought to consider - is it already being done under the radar and this is just a way to cover their asses?
Sounds feasible and from what is going on looks like it is being implemented.
ReplyDeleteHowever, there is one flaw in your reasoning. The NHS won't be able to handle anything, reduced workload or nor. So the NHS won't come out of it smelling of roses. What it will say though is that 'We need to increase the numbers using this pathway so that the NHS can cope.
Fortunately I'll already be dead by the time it happens.
ReplyDeleteJH: Welcome to the end game, boys and girls.
ReplyDeleteI've blogged about this a couple of times. How long before the voluntary becomes mandatory? How long before being unproductive becomes a reason for mandatory euthanasia? After all isn't it your duty not to be a burden on your family, or then by extension, the state? Slippery slopes are created for the best or reasons, but we know full well that the various barriers that stop the worst of implementations can easily be removed over time, once the slope exists.
ReplyDelete"Logan's Run" was predictive programming.
ReplyDeleteJH: Dangerously close unless enough wake up early enough.
ReplyDeleteThis revolting practice is already in operation. My wife was killed by this process, the ALLEGED DNR notice never existed, and, to THIS grieving husband, it was akin to MANSLAUGHTER.
ReplyDelete