Staff at the UK’s national institute for artificial intelligence and data science have expressed “serious concerns” about the organisation’s approach to diversity after it appointed four men to senior roles. A letter addressed to the leadership of the Alan Turing Institute (ATI) said the appointments showed a “‘continuing trend of limited diversity within the institute’s senior scientific leadership”.
“Our intention is not to undermine the professional achievements of these esteemed colleagues and that we’re looking forward to working together with them. Rather, our aim is to highlight a broader issue within our institute’s approach to diversity and inclusivity, particularly in scientific leadership roles, with a specific eye towards gender diversity and inclusivity,” said the letter.
So, just how 'unrepresentative (as if that mattered) is the technology industry?
One in four senior tech employees in the UK are women, according to the annual diversity in tech report by the Tech Talent Charter, a government-backed industry group, while 14% of senior tech role holders are ethnic minorities.
According to the 2021 census, the ethnic minority population of the UK is 18% so they aren't really doing too bad.
ATI’s chief executive said the part government-funded organisation was “committed” to increasing the presence of people from under-represented groups in AI and data science.
I have only one question: why?
Why don't these diversity obsessives ever set up their own organisations where they could practise diversity till the cows come home?
ReplyDeleteInstead of employing the best qualified and experienced, why not employ a black, transgender lesbian, a quadriplegic dwarf jihadist, a dyslexic, dyspraxic blind person, and someone who thinks he's a furry, all in the name of diversity? What could go wrong? Sounds just like a government department.
ReplyDeletePenseivat