The gainsaying trolls

The tactics used by gainsayers are both simple and far-reaching, comprehensive. There are gameplans they invariably follow.

For example, a genuine pundit calling out miscreants over inconvenient truths gets the marginalisation first.   So Mark Steyn gets shunted off GB News as unpalatable for M25 bubble eyes and ears … they like their “truths” in more respectable form within the three wise monkeys bubble.  Lively debate over an approved, narrow range of topics, everyone happy, boat rockers marginalised.

Private Eye’s anonymous ‘MD’ has written an article in the magazine this week about what’s behind the recent excess deaths and whether the vaccines could be involved. For a mainstream piece on the topic it’s unusually polite and balanced – it refrains from any scoffing or offhand dismissal, though naturally rules out vaccines as unlikely.

I just look at that and shake my head sadly.  For a start … even considering Hislop’s Woke left rag as a “mainstream piece” is risible and reveals all Will Jones’s and Toby Young’s limited range of reality in comfy Greater London.

There’s an organisation called VAERS who have been tabulating adverse reactions, there’ve been undertaker shots of the clots, in a phone call I had with the NHS itself in 2021, she was the one introducing the topic, not me. Our site across the way has been listing these adverse events since 2021, we’ve posted pdfs and reports, even from the Lancet … but in piecemeal form, as and when they’ve arisen.

That’s before we even get o the anecdotal.

For example, just imagine one of these gainsayers had seen the posts by Grandpa on his beloved wife and the treatment she’d had … and then this person swoops in and demands, “Proof?”  Anyone losing an elderly loved one to the Hancock lunacy as well … it’s one thing demanding evidence, quite rightly, at which we say, “Posts passim,” but it’s quite another to ride in on a high horse with zero contrary evidence, demanding, “Proof?” In a weaponised fashion.

Especially with the campaigns of suppression going on, e.g. the same treatment now given to Dr. Simone Gold that was given to Mark Steyn, that was given to James O’Keefe … and what of Julian Assange by the way?  They wait till all mention dies away, then quietly extradite to the very people he exposed.

There’s a quote on a quite different issue, early dating of the bible … no, I’m not bringing religion into it, I’m bringing in shoddy scholasticism which applies right across society, esp. in the judiciary:

Sir Norman Anderson, describing himself as "an academic from another discipline” who has browsed widely in the writings of contemporary theologians and biblical scholars, wrote in Lawyer Among Theologians, Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1973, p15, about the quality of the criticism of the anti-Christian so-called intellectuals:

"At times [I am] astonished by the way in which they handle their evidence, by the presuppositions and a priori convictions with which some of them clearly (and even, on occasion, on their own admission) approach the documents concerned, and by the positively staggering assurance with which they make categorical pronouncements on points which are, on any showing, open to question, and on which equally competent colleagues take a diametrically opposite view."

A perfect example was Brexit when one group of lawyers was quoting English common law and various acts along the way, against EU lawyers who were quoting an entirely different set of acts of their parlmt. There was no middle ground. One lot had might on its side, the realpolitik of 2010, the other was relying on specifically English judicial history.

Broadening this still further, consider those, e.g. on GB news or Gabbard or Hannity, who make all the right noises on things of small consequence, e.g. thundering on about “free speech” or “democracy” as broadly as possible, then quoting dumping Newsmax as a dastardly plot by the PTB … quite ignoring GB News and Steyn or quite ignoring Newsmax’s own censorious style which we’d called out.

It’s a much used tactic, used for example by Breitbart of late … the controlled opposition.  If you want the real opposition at any given time, ferret out the marginalised and mocked, I’d suggest, such as former doctors and nurses who’ve used their names … and then are never heard from again.