Low-traffic neighbourhoods significantly reduce the amount of motor vehicles within their boundaries without appearing to push traffic on to roads around their edges, the most comprehensive study yet of such schemes in the UK has concluded.They don't evaporate, do they?
While the authors behind the research, from the University of Westminster’s Active Travel Academy (ATA), noted they only had useable data for just under half the 96 LTNs installed in London between March 2020 and May 2021, but said there was significant overall evidence of so-called traffic evaporation.Oh. My mistake!
The research, which was based on traffic count data before and after the installation of 46 so-called LTNs in London, found a reduction in motor traffic within the zones of 32.7% when measured as the median, and a 46.9% drop when calculated as the mean. Of the 413 roads inside the LTNs with before-and-after traffic counts, the percentage experiencing an average of fewer than 1,000 motor vehicles a day, seen as a good shorthand for a street receptive to more cycling and walking, rose from 41% to 66%.
But surely, unless they also measure the amount of before and after cycling and walking, they can't say that that's what people are doing instead?
Not sure what timescale is encompassed by this "study", and giving it a lot of leeway in assuming it's not all doctored and made up bullshit, given the price of everything, I would suspect that people are driving less because of the expense.
ReplyDeleteBut of course it doesn't matter. Take away private cars, now what's the question?
It almost certainly is doctored in some way. They all are.
Delete"March 2020 and May 2021"
ReplyDeleteWasn't there something else going on between those dates that might account for "traffic evaporation"? Lockdown? Work from home?
Very rarely are any practical measurements made in these trials - see the many 20mph limits where av. speeds don't change as they are not enforced (good). They are seen by the devotees as successful - ignoring effects on others - and are cast in stone thereafter.
ReplyDeleteAnd never ever reversed...
Delete