It's the sources which really count

This post will appear in two places, it also cross-refers, as there's little point just transferring graphics from one place to another.  It's about sources, multiple sources, plus things triggered in our heads when we see something which adds to something we saw earlier.

This is not even up yet at our place yonder but it will be this afternoon:

It Feels Like We Are Watching the First Wholly Manufactured Election in Our History in Which All Key Competitive Races Were Programmed By Langley.

There's a different source which says much the same thing and I saw similar yesterday.

The US midterms that was and four specifics I'll refer to now, from a virtual torrent of information, including that quote, also Trump conceding so quickly, by saying, "We can lose the battle but learn much in order to win the war."

Really?  In Kari Lake's case in corrupt Maricopa, a firebrand MAGA went into an election run by her opponent Kate Hobbs, Secretary of State, in which the machines suddenly stopped working and Lake's voters in strong GOP precincts were told to stay in line for hours. If you could not, you left the ballot for later sending downtown to Hobbs's counting centre.  There was footage of ballot dumping as well and, "Here we go again." Hobbs had refused to debate, plus she has a strong Soros connection.

There was a brain damaged vegetable sent to the Senate and the memes of course featured Biden and him attempting to converse.

All that was ignored by Mad Cow Maddow on skeleton CNN whose faux outrage was over armed "thugs" standing over ballot boxes to prevent Demrats voting. Quite ignored.

Back over here, Yvette Cooper flat out lies about no plans for digital ID and this item from Wales completely ignores the bellowing elephant in the room. If you still resolutely do not understand the propaganda job being done on Welsh people, even in the url, then there is no chance you'd ever understand.

This comment very much sees:

I saw this on the *** today and wondered why our 'conservative govt' are still letting them land - surely Border force and RNLI are commiting offences too! 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-63555323 

Since 28 June 2022, it has been a specific crime to knowingly arrive in the United Kingdom without proper permission. The penalty is up to four years in jail. This offence of illegal arrival was created by the Nationality and Borders Act. Tom Pursglove, the then junior ministers for tackling illegal immigration, explained to MPs that the proposed new offence aimed to tackle small boat migrants. "They arrive in, but may not technically enter, the UK," he said.

It speaks of "committing offences", which also takes us back to Arizona, plus the southern border. 

What was the one resounding "MAGA" success by the way?  De Santis on 60%, a race allowed to be free because he took steps, plus he was allowed to by the Feds.  Why?  Pundits point to kicking out Zuckerbucks, plus laws tightening voting method, plus a task force overseeing voting in key places, e.g. Broward. Plus he's the only real chance to stymie Trump in '24, plus his wife is WEF.

We now come to sources.  Quite gone as far as reality goes are those whose sources are MSM and office talk, plus talkback radio. We're not even on the same page to begin with. Even we over yonder have been hotly debating sources of late ... contributors have been putting cases and backgrounding sources, ferreting, which has seen certain exposers of controlled opposition spammed and even refused the right to comment.  By whom?  Not by me, that's for sure.

Censorship ... big tech censorship. On the other hand, there is one Demrat troll here, a leftwing academic from the States whom I'll openly block ... if you're a political blogger, tweeter or gabber, tell me you have never had to deal with trolls or censorship?

Why does Toby Young ignore the very real reticence on many MAGA's parts to roundly endorse De Santis?  Simple ... Toby's politics are M25 bubble conventional, LBC stuff, even GB News.  The sources sent by others on De Santis he's not seen because he's never looked because he doesn't know how, because he's so busily off on his own white charger.  Worthily, yes, but ignoring most of the minutiae.  Thoroughly decent chap and all that.

Sources, people ... sources ... in the final analysis, we are but our sources in the political conversation.  And no one has accessed all possible sound sources ... plus too often they start off soundly but then branch off into trollery.