Some two odd years ago, my optometrist told me that my eyesight would be deteriorating over the next year, because of cataracts developing in both of my eyes. I felt reassured, because the cataracts had not developed to such an extent that my vision was not yet impaired.
A year later, another eye sight test, and the Main Man told me that I should consider putting myself and the eye test results forward, via my GP, to the NHS, for consideration as to Cataract Surgery. I agreed, because if a specialist states I may soon have a problem, I wanted to do something towards the removal of that problem.
In due course, at the lava-flow speed of the NHS, I received instructions from the NHS that I could book a consultation with an eye specialist. I followed the booking procedure, and received word that, yes, I could make an appointment: but only after a waiting period of forty eight weeks.
After a short pause to check if my bank balance was still healthy, I commenced calling all the Private Hospitals to see if my needs could be accommodated. I chose a Newcastle Hospital, as the optical surgery people said that there were vacancies with only a six week wait before the surgery could be done. This of course was at a cost of +/-£2,500.00.
I was given the full test treatment, eyes measured for the lens replacement, and had my Left Eye given the full ‘decoke’ treatment. After a three week wait, so my eye sight could adjust itself to the new lens, I found that my left eyesight had gained the full clarity of fifty years ago.
As I really could not afford another private operation, I set myself to wait; but Lady Luck smiled, and I was contacted by the NHS, and asked If I could take up an appointment which had been cancelled at short notice. So, early March, I was there like a shot, but found that, as opposed to Private Practice, everything moved with that afore-mentioned lave flow speed.
I had one appointment with a female consultant, who had all my notes. She checked me out, then told me that I would be given another appointment to be measured. I did murmur that I wondered why I couldn’t be measured then and there, as they had all the latest optical equipment.
I honestly did not know until that moment that a facial expression could mirror the mind behind that face, but I learnt at the speed of light that this was the NHS, not private practice, and everyone had to take their place in the queue.
So I returned, and had my right eye’s lens measured. I then had to cancel the first operation appointment, because I had an attack of the Virus, so had to wait six weeks, as the hospital demanded that no possibility existed of the virus getting exposed in one of their operating theatres.
But I eventually got to lie down, and have this alarmingly attractive young woman (Well, at my age everyone is young) slice into my eye, and conduct the whole caboodle with care and accuracy. I had to return in two weeks, so this young woman could remove the suture she had placed on the top corner of my eye, and three weeks after that, I was eye-tested, and given the all-clear.
So the reader may ask why an eighty-one year old bloke is describing the tortuous route towards regaining full vision with the cataract operations. It is simply this: if you drive, you MUST, MUST, MUST, ensure that your vision meets the legal requirement for driving, you have to be able to read a vehicle number plate at 20 metres. (66 feet away). The DVLA requires that, if you cannot meet that standard, you remove yourself from driving, until an optometrist conducts the tests, and allows for corrective glasses, or indeed an operation, which will then allow you to drive safely.
Grandfather James Tassell would be alive today if “Reckless and foolish” Peter Gardner, 82, nearly the same age as myself, had such poor vision he “shouldn’t have been driving” when he “catapulted” James Tassell six feet into the air. His vision was so bad he could not make out a car licence plate three metres (9ft 10ins) away.
A court also heard the retired rail worker had recently been told by an optician he may be developing cataracts – but failed to arrange a follow-up appointment.
As an ex Traffic Police officer, I am very much in favour of eyesight tests being carried out at regular intervals, especially when you have to apply for driving licence renewal every three years on teaching the age of 70. Relying on the applicant to tell the truth regarding their health and vision is not enough. A couple of lessons with a driving instructor would not go amiss either as traffic conditions change.
ReplyDeleteThe person who’s always driven, and relied on it, finds it near impossible to stop, esp. if it’s his independence involved. With my father, he died before the issue came up. My stepfather was an adept driver, backing into narrow spaces etc. but the day he clipped the pillar of the garage, he gave it away. In my case, it was on a bicycle that I gave away car driving.
DeleteHeading down a hill with a bag of shopping on each handlebar end, I just couldn’t keep the balance at levels it had been. Gave away cycling, gave away driving.
I have been short sighted all my life so wearing glasses is normal for me.Being 84 I have to have a medical every two years and that includes an eyesight test.I have cataracts but they fortunately are very slow in developing and have not yet affected my distance vision which with my glasses is 20/20,I am affected by bright hazy sun, but using my prescription sunglasses takes care of that.Having driven since I was 20, I am not looking forward to being told that I must give it up
ReplyDeletejohnd2008, Given the waiting time for cataract operations on the NHS, and if your optometrist tells you that the operation would be of great benefit, best to get him to forward your application to the Eyesight people in the NHS. The sooner you apply, the sooner you will be seen. Obviously, if you have the savings to go private, that may be the better way.
DeleteMy own eyesight deteriorated rapidly, from one exam to the next.
Don't chance it, try and get it sorted, is my own advice.
I've always found the number plate test pretty pointless - surely a test with moving 'target' would be more sensible?
ReplyDelete