She pushed him away, but he responded by "grabbing her round the throat and digging his fingers into her neck". The defendant continued to be "verbally abusive", calling her "disgusting" and saying that her mum was a "paedo".
Thomas, of Mossley Hill Drive, then told her: "I hope you get raped. I will rape your mum and siblings while I'm at it."
He then began "stroking her face" and grabbed her breasts over her clothing as she was pinned up against a wall. The sex offender "suggested she was enjoying it" and added: "How does it feel to be touched without consent?"
Where do we even start? Let's drop this 'oh well, it's only Scousers' thing before proceeding.
Essentially there's a concept, a code of conduct, called Chivalry but it's fraught in 2022 because of its underlying premise ... that the female even requires help in the first place.
Feminazism stresses that wimmin can do anything at all a man can, even better, that they have 'rights', that they can go any place in the world by themselves, clad however they wish, act as sexually as they wish ... and every male immediately backs off and bows to her, coz she is Woman.
Which produces the type of vile harpy we see everywhere today, from Harbag to those stupid girls with the Refugees Welcome signs - at least those kids looked basically human. That's before looking at the Woke "men" with wispy beards who see those harpies as women. Sad.
Vicious little bstds too, like this one above here, also like the professor with the bicycle chain slashing a woman around the head from behind at a demonstration. I'd like it to be that simple - that on one side are the demi-man Woke vagina and boob possessors and Woke excuses for men ... and on the other side are real men and women.
Not that simple. Even among unreconstructed males ... actually rife among us ... is this innate view that Woman is sex on legs.
Coz she is. Woman is built for babies, sex, dancing and home renovation. Man for physical work, servicing the Lady and sport. The fact that she is capable of so much more seems to escape so many men and boys. Part of that is the death of love and romance, the hook-up culture, porn in the case of boys, the separation of the sexes due to resentments built up and then manifested bizarrely ... and so on.
Part of it is that gals are essentially cute the way they walk or waddle, the way they talk, the way they think. Why would anyone put a gal down for her most endearing traits?
Answer I think is that we resent the bloody feminazis, therefore we project onto any woman. And all men have some common traits, all women some common traits. What the nancy boys and vile harpies have done is magnify and exacerbate those things to the exclusion of all the great things in both sexes.
If you can't think of anything Woman can do, let Peggy Lee enlighten you again.
So that crim in the Echo story obviously reacted to a female acting stupidly ... not unknown among girls and cranked up today due to false non-educating, dire 'entertainment' and the breakdown of any kind of chaperoning ... any kind of teaching ... any kind of parenting.
See, the interesting thing is that the man who steps in, chivalrously, for a female is actually, in harpy terms, a misogynist by definition. Is there any surprise at MGTOW? But this wasn't MGTOW above, was it? This was sheer hatred and physical attack.
There's a fundamental premise in this misogyny practised by the chivalrous and that is ... that whatever a woman does, however she attacks you, kicks you, throws plates at you, you keep your equilibrium. Mind you, with the love of my life, I found the full nelson and scissor hold effective until she calmed down and it converted into something else ... but that was only with the less phlegmatic non-Anglo.
Bottom line is, talking to the boys here ... do you love the species called woman, deep down ... or do you not? Do you judge that species by the harpies and SJWs ... or by good women who are dotted about here and there, a huge number snapped up as keepers long ago?
One thing I do know is that that sort of yoof above is a dead loss as a man. He deserves a long term of incarceration.
I mentioned this to an American friend and asked him about similar incidents. He replied by referring to the, now and increasing, " The Rock" principle. The actor, Dwayne Johnson, used to be a professional wrestler, called 'The Rock', and is built like a brick loo. The question one should ask themselves if they would act towards The Rock as they are considering acting towards others. If the answer, as seems intelligent, is 'no', then don't do it to anyone else.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, it seems it hasn't reached these shores yet. The basic level of behaviour should be "treat others as you would wish to be treated". The problem is that one had to be able to read before they can become aware of this.
The thing about chivalry was that it was a “two way street”. Men treated women with respect, protected and provided for them and … women would ‘only’ notice, date and marry men who did so. It wasn’t men who gave up on chivalry, women killed it (because they didn’t like all that icky reciprocity, responsibility and restriction demanded of them in return for all the benefits. they wanted it both ways).
ReplyDeleteWomen (as a group, for good and proper evolutionary/survival reasons) ‘submit’ to ‘the strong’ (witness them supporting and throwing themselves at any ‘ethnic’ they meet). Also, hypergamy, the 80:20 rule is incontrovertible, proven fact (80% of women will show interest, date, have sex and marry only 20% of men – specifically what they, individually, view as “alphas” i.e. those with looks, money, a bad reputation, criminal record, or just the best tatts).
You can blame men as a whole, for the behaviour of a tiny minority (unless you’re talking about certain demographics and ethnicities where it is the vast majority – but we’re not allowed to mention that are we? Because they’re favoured by the very women who claim to dislike that behaviour) but … to point out its increase is entirely a ‘reaction’ to how women behave is verboten (I particularly like the automatic response from the usual suspects that “All you men keep judging women as a group, stop it, we’re individuals” and the amazing inability to see the hypocrisy there).
So? Are there a (relatively) small number of ‘males’ out there who are, as you portray, violent, aggressive and, basically, sexual predators? Yes, and there always have been, and always will, so what has changed to make that behaviour more common? Answer, women facilitating and allowing (even rewarding) such behaviour, whilst at the same time ignoring, or attacking ‘normal’ men for minor infractions (asking politely, but unwanted, for a date) or spurious irrelevancies (holding a door), and … specifically targetting any normal man who acts against the claimed hated violent men (if it were left purely to men, those violent scum would be … extinct).
When you encourage/reward the people and behaviour you claim to dislike whilst punishing the behaviour you claim to wish for, you have no, nada, zero, zilch legitimate reason to blame anyone but yourself if you get more of the former.
I’m one of those 80% males. Not bad looking (I haven’t needed the paper-bag in public for years), law-abiding, respectful, good jobs, stable and thus … boring, ignored, attacked and demeaned my entire life (well, until now in my 50’s when they’ve all ridden the c*ck-carousel, have five children from four marriages and suddenly want … I’ve been inundated with attention for a year or so, but I wouldn’t touch any of it with … yours).
I’m also ex-forces, ex-nurse, 6’ 5” 18 st, and if I witness a woman being attacked, or even having an accident I … walk away (painful as it is to do so) because (from repeated experience) I either get accused of inappropriate behaviour (whilst saving their life, they know it’s untrue but see a chance for attention/money) or get arrested for ‘attacking’ their assailant (even when doing nothing more than standing in the way). I don’t ‘choose’ to act that way, women have forced me to do so.
ReplyDeleteThe fact even you joke about extreme violence by your wife, whilst ignoring the simple fact that if the behaviours were reversed ‘you’ would be the very subject of this discussion, is … a perfect example. Women who act like ladies, realising they cannot compete physically with a male and require ‘consideration’, are treated as such. Women (now) who act like violent, screeching harpies and rely on courts to punish anyone who dares to prevent their tantrums, deserve anything they get (you want equality, well a man who attacks me gets punched).
As I said ( a while ago. I’m not verbose, I’m just naturally big-worded) chivalry, and how men now behave, is entirely down to women – a reaction. If women suddenly decided to return to the old ways and demanded respect (with their own attendant reciprocal behaviour) right this second, cloaks would be sold out and there’d be a queue of men by puddles to lay them down for women within the hour.
Women worst affected? Women broke it, and only women can fix it (assuming they even really want to).
I still love specific women, I utterly despise western women as a group. You can point to the occasional ‘good’ woman, but evidence shows, whatever they say, when it comes time they’ll use any and all of the biases and hypocritical systems against you when ‘it's their turn’.
As men we will all agree with your final paragraph but … whilst women will appear to agree, I’ll guarantee he (post and even during incarceration) will have ‘more’ female attention now than ever - and if that doesn't tell you all you need to know about women, i can't help.
Thanks for those. Food for thought.
ReplyDelete