Of narrative, myrmidons and karens

There are quite a few aspects to this and they can't all be covered in one post. Let's start with Polly on Bitchute and her dismembering of Scott Adams [Dilbert].

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/gjZqilI35av1/

Not going to actually run it here because he intensely annoys in that performance, Adams, but it does need mentioning and essentially, it comes down to evidence piling up on the lack of efficacy of certain procedures, plus he and also DJT have bought a narrative wholesale and have then been pushing it, without even looking at the mounting evidence, inc. quite obvious cases every few days, all reported by us, but in SA's and DJT's eyes, we may has well have never prsented it for months and months.

Were it to have stayed as just that - two people with cognitive issues in their own homes - then fine, let it be so.  But no, they can't leave it at that, can they, because they're this ridiculous new Woke weasel word 'influencers'.  Both want to be the people's poet, the people's champ, not part of the Global Rest cabal and both have made populist moves towards that end, one in a presidency, the other in a Dilbert cartoon.

All the while buying the global narrative and pushing it at the same time.  And that, ladies and gentlemen = cognitive dissonance, as Polly explains the term in her intro.

Now, do they leave it at that?  Nope, they do this American thing they call 'doubling down', they actually quie belligerently try to hit back when called out.  Pure alpha male.  Female SJWs also do it  but let's not complicate this.  Adams actually chooses those words 'cognitive dissonance' to project onto us in a podcast.  In other words, we have cognitive dissonance.

Yet Polly places those words beside footage of him saying the opposite, like a Fauci.  See, the issue in their heads is not to have the facts straight at all but to be the beloved 'good guys', acting chummy, matey and speaking the vernacular, taking us into their confidence, projecting this man of the people shtick.  For what purpose?

To push the global narrative, but in a people's poet way, speaking the language of ordinary guys, not the language of the Schwab/Gates cabal they are joining.  Commenter Twisted Root wrote this:

Adams is experiencing the downside of when hypnotic suggestion begins to wear off.

Let's self-examine.  In which part of the lockdown, deathjab, mask madness for two years have we pundits altered our position?  Even if we could get those two to admit our single line throughout, then we are insta-dismissed as conspiracy nuts.

The aim is, at all times, that they are the good guys and we are the loons.  That is the bottom line, the whole raison d'etre.  And what is ours?  What is our shtick?  To expose, call out of course, never ceasing.  In the way the media is supposed to do its job.