One good aspect of retirement, as a friend of mine wrote yesterday, is that now, as our own bosses, we decide how to spend our quarantined time until interned in camps [which may well be coming, depending on who prevails] - the one good aspect is that we can still reflect in the wee hours on all we've presented over the past few days and relate it to critical earlier points over the years.
And thus I cast an eye down the topics below and at t'other place, and then think of something Christy said a decade ago:
She made herself unpopular by squarely attacking the low quality of feminists, in their behaviour, in their ability to carry out duties in roles above their station of capability and in their quite twisted and self-centred ideology.
What has been demonstrated over and over is that they might spout fine words about it being on behalf of 'all women' but they actually can't give a rat's about other women - allowing women to progress on their own terms, at their own pace, within the comfort zone where they feel capable. Therefore, the ladies could feel confident. The feminists are not interested in other women.
Two quite telling examples included when the paedo-excusing Harbag of Labour infamy held a harpies meeting over Gordon Brown and certainly they had a case - I'll come back to that case.
But the telling part was it got nowhere between themselves because they weren't in the least concerned about others landing high roles, plum jobs, they were concerned only with li'l ole N1. Thus there was trouble with Ms Ambitious Flint who was carving out her new empire as well ... they all were.
In social media, they were constantly asked about women in Death Cult lands, esp. Iran, with those before and after pictures. Then there was the FGM, a major topic, honour killings and throwing gays off roofs. Zero response from the harpies. They didn't give a damn.
Now extend that to other appalling creatures from Pelosi to Heels Up and something begins to emerge, which relates back to Gordo's alleged misogyny. The only conclusion is that if people like Christy, at the end of that link above, is an example of a good, capable woman and I've seen no suggestion otherwise by the boys, then clearly something is very wrong in the appointment of women.
Do not misread that. It does not say that there's something wrong 'in appointing women per se' but that entirely the wrong ones are over-appointed [Peter Principle]. I mean just look at the scumbags - who are those crims with ankle bracelets in parlmt? Look at useless Abbott etc.
From a distant place, observing, one can only conclude that these were always meant to fail and fall - Rebekah Brooks, Carly Fiorini et al.
And who appointed these people? At this stage, Woke harpies appointed by Woke harpies before them, people with mush for brains ... but go further down the rathole ... appointed by Men in High Places - Boomers and preBoomers. And these are most misogynist indeed, they are Masons, Rotary, Shriners etc.
In other words, though the narrative created by these men speaks of equality and diversity, they knew and know fullwell how these low quality appointees must fail. They want them to fail - see Gordo again. And these 'women' will fail, as sure as night follows day. Or stress out in ways she was never meant to do.
Because by a convoluted process in which constant failure by 'women' is highlighted, there's a double victory by cabalists - women never really break that glass ceiling for very long [Marisa Mayer, Elizabeth Theranos] ... it creates a backlash and a litany of failure allowing vultures such as me to write these posts ... it creates a bow wave, in nautical terms, over which these 'women' must become unpleasant demi-men in order to survive.
I'm the first to concede that the odds are stacked against such appointees. I mentioned a double victory. The second part of the cabal victory is, that in order to ensure that 'women' of a certain Cressida Dick type do retain power, more and more of the narrative filtered wrong type are appointed, like illegals pouring across borders.
The result is twistedfemme-archy, in which trad jobs disappear, e.g. manufacturing and the dirty jobs, jobs the hated white male used to do ... and this in turn has a twofold result - jobs become service industry, IT project managers which women in IT usually fill, or else HR, and the formerly employed men are now on zero contracts or benefits.
Hardly good marriage material either.
Which in turn wrecks families as the core unit of society, both directly and in the long term through the pincer movement of now indolent men of Boomer and Gen X years, together with the new twisted Millennial and postMillennial demi-man, stoked full of narrative, like Tyler in his menial role in the Grammarly ad, with Anita, his boss, bossing it in her office.
Years ago, I was working for women in a shop and one thing not valued in the least was any form of masculinity. I was often questioned about my attitude towards women, they were paranoid. But I was happy to acknowledge that these ladies were vastly superior to me in the field of fabric, design, texture, presentation, all the quick tricks in doing what ladies do well. It was fascinating how they could so easily do all that, the eye to hand coordination.
And no male, IMHO, can beat a woman for process and administering. Male ego, excuse my French, is an effing bore.
The standing joke played on me was a store dummy in the window and lady shoppers would come in, come up to me, and ask to try on that particular dress, so I had to be able to remove it in under about five seconds [size 10 by the way] and thus learnt that new skill, much to their amusement. In short, I was the learner, the women were in their field of expertise. Fine.
I also became the bouncer protecting them without ever giving even the slightest hint that they needed that. Thus I would accompany the boss to the bank in that role. She was confused when I insisted on walking on the outside of the footpath whichever side of the road we were on. It was interesting for an aspiring jack of all trades for awhile.
Coming back to the cabalists who set all this in motion decades, even a century and a quarter ago, even further back to Marx himself - they know human nature back to front, because their Boss knows human nature ... because he hates humanity [see the writings of the bible and Crowley, Pike]. They knew how to play on traditional points of grievance, to simplify and buzz phrase them for the dumbed down, whom they've also taken care of.
These are the things we have inherited in our time, as if our time were tabula rasa, the unwritten page - it's anything but unwritten, each era, is stacked ... and it's stacked against humanity ... both sexes.
Which is why proper history, as distinct from the feminazi rewritten c*** masquerading as 'history', is so important to preserve in secret hidey-holes so the thought police never get to it.
Another good woman:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Unburden yourself here: