Saturday 14 August 2021

What to believe anymore?

In the light of the sheer mass of lies pouring out of the CMOs, the WHO and other bodies, let alone all the bizarre behaviour such as setting up Nightingale hospitals and then taking them down, the empty wards secretly filmed, I'm deeply suspicious of the third paragraph below - 'this study' to 'the world'.

What we seem to have here is a journalistic article rather than a 'scientific' study and I'd certainly like to explore the Journal of Infection first and see who they are.  This was the article:

On August 9, The Journal of Infection published a peer-reviewed study titled:

Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination

This study revealed the terrifying news to the world:

Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection is a safety concern for vaccine strategies. In a recent publication, Li et al. (Cell 184 :1-17, 2021) have reported that infection-enhancing antibodies directed against the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein facilitate virus infection in vitro, but not in vivo. However, this study was performed with the original Wuhan/D614G strain.

Since the Covid-19 pandemic is now dominated with Delta variants, we analyzed the interaction of facilitating antibodies with the NTD of these variants. 

Using molecular modelling approaches, we show that enhancing antibodies have a higher affinity for Delta variants than for Wuhan/D614G NTDs. We show that enhancing antibodies reinforce the binding of the spike trimer to the host cell membrane by clamping the NTD to lipid raft microdomains. 

This stabilizing mechanism may facilitate the conformational change that induces the demasking of the receptor binding domain. As the NTD is also targeted by neutralizing antibodies, our data suggest that the balance between neutralizing and facilitating antibodies in vaccinated individuals is in favor of neutralization for the original Wuhan/D614G strain. 

However, in the case of the Delta variant, neutralizing antibodies have a decreased affinity for the spike protein, whereas facilitating antibodies display a strikingly increased affinity.

Thus, ADE may be a concern for people receiving vaccines based on the original Wuhan strain spike sequence (either mRNA or viral vectors).

I'll come back shortly to this issue.  Meanwhile, further confusing and confounding going on with the Torba versus Bongino feud - this was on gab:

Today I was flooded with messages about Dan Bongino's ten minute meltdown on his show calling me a "fraud" and a "clown." I watched the clip and was amused by Dan's highly emotional outburst attacking me for simply stating a fact: Rumble, a platform he invested in, claims to support free speech and yet bans "hate speech" with terms of service that are no different than any Big Tech platform. 

When Parler came along and was being shilled by Establishment "conservatives" I warned against falling for the bait and switch. I was right then, and I'm right now. It's not about competition for me. It's about principle. If you're going to call yourself a "free speech" platform then you better have a terms of service that reflects that claim.

Yeeesss, not good between these two.  And it's not helped by Andrew Torba showing Bongino's tweet with almost all of it blacked out - is that open and transparent?  

The proof of the pudding is whether you are allowed to express or whether not. On Twitter, I am not, on Twitter, Bongino is allowed with no restriction. On Gab, I can post with no restriction so far. But that's also so with Ggl and WP in my own case.  Am I a shill for Ggl?  Ggl took N.O. down in 2008, then investigated and restored it. 

Interim advisory

Were I asked how the ordinary person should proceed, I'd say - proceed in terms of the reality of whom is pressing you to do this, do that and how much pressure they're exerting.  And why.  Are they aligned with govt/Big Money or with independent voices within any given field?

On the vaxx, passports and all that, there seems to be a quite cynical experiment, not just medically but in spy-ops in observing and monitoring how far which groups can be pushed and developing  strategies for each of those groups.

The Journal of Infection

Here's our original source, via Steve [N.O. Fri 23a]:

Urgent: We Have a Literal Catastrophe - Antibody Dependent Enhancement Detected with COVID-19

https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/breaking-news-urgent-we-have-a-literal-catastrophe-antibody-dependent-enhancement-detected-with-covid-19

Ggl could be expected to character assassinate him by placing detracting articles at the top of rankings - here are the first three entries:

Not worth bothering with anyone using that sort of language to describe any on the right.  However, I do seem to recall something about SPLC - something about them being far left, which is a bit confusing in this context.

Ah OK, I see - have just gone back to explore and they are the top ranking site flinging mud at Turner, sort of Antifa/BLM thing.  

Everything still in the iffy tray IMHO just now.  Here's Ggl on them:

Reports of research related to any aspect of the fields of microbiology, infection, and host response, whether laboratory, clinical, or epidemiologic, are considered for publication in JID. Major Articles and Brief Reports are peer reviewed; Correspondence is reviewed by the Editors.

I have had a look around and they are an actual body, JofI, seemingly accepted by both sides.

Right, let's look at the link to the show.  Hmmmm, if you go there [link above], then you do seem to be getting the good oil.  But what does it mean to the layman?

To a Simple Ordinary Blogger [SOB] from the NW of the UK, how can I know?  I'm no microbiologist, I'm a journo and we publish what comes in unless it's clearly Woke and/or Great Reset friendly.  You can get all that latter guff in the MSM and from cuck-bloggers with huge followings.

There was a comment by someone with a moniker 'lon':

I don't understand how this ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) works. I read that the antibodies induced by vaccine actually carries the disease to the cells. How it's possible? Isn't more possible that the body reaction to the illness to be so strong that destroy everything, including the healthy tissue? I mean, you don't die because the infection but because the "holes" in your body that are induced by the army of cells and chemicals that should protect you? Maybe it's more like acute autoimmune disease.

I don't ask who they actually are, nor their addresses, it's just a moniker - one judges by the content. To me, it's a legit question though and it's partly answered by the finer print at the Hal Turner link above.

I'd say keep an eye on this ADE issue but be ultra-careful with your sources.  if it's what we think, then the word Nuremberg comes very much into the frame for all put upon people out there.

Lastly for now

Distant Relative posts this:

https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(21)00392-3/fulltext

Highlights:

  • Infection-enhancing antibodies have been detected in symptomatic Covid-19
  • Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) is a potential concern for vaccines
  • Enhancing antibodies recognize both the Wuhan strain and Delta variants
  • ADE of Delta variants is a potential risk for current vaccines
  • Vaccine formulations lacking ADE epitope are suggested 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Unburden yourself here: