Foreword
Long, long ago, in the mists of time, a young man undertook an Economics/Law degree of five years and remembers finding himself in a moot court, only to be plunged into a lecture following that on Keynesian economic theory. At least the economic statistics part of the course was interesting.
As an undergrad, it just seemed to him that some of the theories on money supply were a bit iffy. Lacking the theoretical background to make known these misgivings, he remained shtum with his professor, a most award-dripping man, of vast reputation.
Switching to History and Politics at another university, the young man did far better, attacking Bertrand Russell's syllogism and other delights. This young man does not purport to be any great shakes at leftwing economic theory [Keynes] and his only legal ability was in university debating societies where he found greater success. And as part of that, he was capable of ferreting through libraries not on campus and discovering views quite opposed to Keynes, Russell, Bloom, Piaget and others. Trouble was, it was hardly likely to earn him a degree. He did earn a couple over the journey hut that’s another tale for another time.
Decades later, in July, 2021
This not-so-young man awoke, greatly troubled, because he had done something he regretted, namely attacking the political hero of his good friend and the reasons he did this would take volumes to write in detail.
Given that his main work is blogging on everything under the sun, largely from a dissident right perspective, he not only no longer has access to his boxes of papers in far flung nations, including Russia, France and Sicily, but as he got out of bed, he pulled his back and is typing this with one hand whilst the other supports his weight in some pain, largely by gripping a bo stick as a pillar [cue violins].
He thinks that all this might be a disadvantage in writing this post and may well be some sort of punishment for defying the blogging dark angels and their global hegemony.
The issue below is the late 20s/early 30s in a land across the ocean.
A dour man, not really a populist, with certain iffy things on his own road to power and lacking the common touch, despite the landslide of his accession, he doggedly stuck to his guns on economic theory and spake thus to an audience, the speech which the nation also hears:
No man who has not occupied my position in Washington can fully realize the constant battle which must be carried on against incompetence, corruption, tyranny of government expanded into business activities.If we first examine the effect on our form of government of such a program, we come at once to the effect of the most gigantic increase in expenditure ever known in history.That alone would break down the savings, the wages, the equality of opportunity among our people. These measures would transfer vast responsibilities to the Federal Government from the states, the local governments, and the individuals.But that is not all; they would break down our form of government.Our legislative bodies cannot delegate their authority to any dictator, but without such delegation, every member of these bodies is impelled in representation of the interest of his constituents constantly to seek privilege and demand service in the use of such agencies.Every time the Federal Government extends its arm, 531 Senators and Congressmen become actual boards of directors of that business.
Dear reader, imagine the position of the bo stick blogger with the bad back, faced with only ggl search engine to find what he knows exists from his papers of the past in distant, dusty, now dirty and cobwebbed boxes ... but then, hallelujah, he finds an article by someone who should be opposed to Hoover on the face of it, obviously as it's a leftwing institution in which the article appears, part of today's blanket hegemony.
Sound money
What the real radical [seeker of and defender of roots] does, is auto-question that which the currently Established hegemony seeks to have everyone chanting - you know, like Vaxx! Vaxx! Vaxx! or else we'll incarcerate you, heretic - and the more they chant the mantra of "gold standard is madness" for example, plus attempt to beat him down for challenging the religious “fiat is god” thinking, the more he realises he may be on the right track.
I still see Hoover as a failed president, unable or unwilling to cultivate the personal bond with the electorate that is the ultimate source of power and influence for any elected official. The more I learned of Hoover’s policies, however, the more impressed I became with his insight, vision, and courage—particularly when it came to managing an economy turned hostile. I found, too, that time has done little to discredit his trepidation over the consequences of mounting debt.
Deliberately induced by fiends. Another look at such heretical ideas:
The destruction of the monetary order was the result of deliberate actions on the part of various governments. The government-controlled central banks and, in the United States, the government-controlled Federal Reserve System were the instruments applied in this process of disorganization and demolition.
Yet without exception, all drafts for an improvement of currency systems assign to the government unrestricted supremacy in matters of currency and design, fantastic images of superprivileged superbanks.
Even the manifest futility of the International Monetary Fund does not deter authors from indulging in dreams about a world bank fertilizing mankind with floods of cheap credit.The inanity of all these plans is not accidental. It is the logical outcome of the social philosophy of their authors.
Indeed it is not accidental - immediately I think of the crash of 1857 and Peabody economics, leading to that old maxim:
Never ascribe to coincidence that which can be better explained by applied malice, long ahead of showtime, international malice to boot such as Standard Oil's support of Trotsky in a later era.
That's a maxim far more often borne out in reality, in history. And if there is even an inkling of truth in that maxim, then certain people have much to answer for, keeping a population in a constant state of artificial flux, penury and under control. See Coleman for details.
And strangely, the left have it right in their talk of the 1%, which is really, with hangers-on and facilitators, own-grandmother-sellers, a cabal of fiendish lost souls - Podesta, Clintons, Maxwells, Skull & Bones, New Age loonies such as Strong, Annan, Gore, the societies and 'think tanks' we know of and so on - these diabolical Alinskys have it planned long ahead of showtime - see Coronavirus 2001 to 2018.
But back to the topic - Mises inst:
Monetary reconstruction, including the abandonment of inflation and the return to sound money, is not merely a problem of financial technique that can be solved without change in the structure of general economic policies.
There cannot be stable money within an environment dominated by ideologies hostile to the preservation of economic freedom.
Bent on disintegrating the market economy, the ruling parties will certainly not consent to reforms that would deprive them of their most formidable weapon, inflation.
Monetary reconstruction presupposes first of all total and unconditional rejection of those allegedly progressive policies which in the United States are designated by the slogans New Deal and Fair Deal.
Ah ... there we have it. There we have it. [Hang on one moment as I climb my trusty bo stick and stumble off for some some coffee and crumbly West Cork carrot cake.]
I'm afraid I'm attacking Divine Roosevelt as one of the cabal
If you read through all the preceding articles at the end of links - not long articles, give it fifteen minutes, tops, then we see a pattern of an unsuspecting Right being out-planned and out-ideologied by the juggernaut of the crash and induced destruction. If you look at the actions of the DemRats and those behind them at that time, pretending this was a red-blue issue as Swift had suggested - then you see a pattern remarkably like today's, with obstruction all the way along the line - not the slightest intention of letting something run its course.
After all, they had the man in the wings, didn't they? And up he steps for three and a bit terms. As I wrote elsewhere before the back went:
The question with both FDR and wife is where to start. The 1933 order and 1934 ratification is only a portal into exploring the criminal insanity of the confiscations - he was about far worse than that. As for the occult wife, we now see the results in the UN channeled Great Work of Ages. The greatest issue in exploring this is all major search engines will not hear a word of their behind the scenes doings. Like Dark Barry, they’re unassailable. The topic is huge but hidden from sight.
You see, this is my chagrin today - an old friend who's ideology takes the other path and thus I must seem at a minimum, a loony, or at worst, diabolical, plus I have offended against blog netiquette. And yet I do feel that this is on the right path:
The gold standard is not currently used by any government. Britain stopped using the gold standard in 1931 and the U.S. followed suit in 1933 and abandoned the remnants of the system in 1973.
The gold standard was completely replaced by fiat money, a term to describe currency that is used because of a government's order, or fiat, that the currency must be accepted as a means of payment.
In the U.S., for instance, the dollar is fiat money, and for Nigeria, it is the naira.
There it is, voila.
The appeal of a gold standard is that it arrests control of the issuance of money out of the hands of imperfect human beings. With the physical quantity of gold acting as a limit to that issuance, a society can follow a simple rule to avoid the evils of inflation. The goal of monetary policy is not just to prevent inflation, but also deflation, and to help promote a stable monetary environment in which full employment can be achieved.
However, the downside:
... when such a simple rule is adopted, inflation can be avoided, but strict adherence to that rule can create economic instability, if not political unrest.
Two things from these last two quotes - firstly imperfect humans, e.g. cabalists and the greedy who jump onboard, secondly political unrest.
Political unrest is night follows day when systems keep being dumped for new ones, then later, the other system is forced back in - fiat under the control of shadow govts. Much unrest.
And those shadow govts are all global marxist, using the term only as one people would understand - in fact it long precedes Marx, long precedes Weishaupt.
Trump did not fail because the ideas were flawed - he failed because of the closely organised wreckers who are even today hard at it, never resting until humans are destroyed as independent entities.
Roosevelt and wife, in that context, were monsters and yet they're seen as some sort of demigod saviours by far too many Americans.
[Now the back will not allow me to continue for some time.]
Professor Walter Veight has produced some very entertaining and informative videos about secret societies and they are still on YouTube. He chronicles the progress of these societies, including Weishaupt, Blavatsky, Bailey, Besant, Teilhard de Chardin, the UN, Strong as you mention. The UN has a room in their New York building which is euphemistically referred to as for use by all religions to worship but in actuality is pagan in nature.
ReplyDeleteLook at who donated the land in New York on which the UN building stands.
Not forgetting the Lucifer Trust, renamed as the Lucis trust to try to disguise its purpose, and its relationship to the UN.
But we know that, for the time being, until Jesus returns, Satan is the ruler of this world.