The Mail on Sunday can reveal that NHS employee Omar Abdallah Mansuur, 39 – an influential imam – faces claims that he decreed a fellow Muslim should get the death penalty for insulting the Prophet Mohammed. His broadcast was made to tens of thousands of followers and is thought to be the first time a cleric in Britain has made such a threat.
In some of his inflammatory diatribes, Mansuur appears on video from inside St Thomas’ Hospital – directly across the Thames from the Houses of Parliament – where he works in procurement.
YCMIU, could you? And these days you no longer have to…
Staff describe bespectacled Mansuur, a British national of Somali origin who lives in North London with his wife and children, as unassuming and polite. But his social media profiles tell a different story.
Shocker!
On Friday, after the MoS passed on its evidence, the hospital said Mansuur had been suspended pending an investigation.
And hopefully, the police will be taking an interest too. How many more of these have infiltrated our institutions?
A bereaved mother has said getting more rights for parents would take her one step closer to making something positive come out of the loss of her son.
Ellen Roome, from Cheltenham, believes her 14-year-old son Jools died after an online challenge went wrong and his social media accounts could provide the evidence needed. She has been campaigning for "Jools' Law", which would allow parents to access the social media accounts of their children if they die, and the petition is due to be debated in parliament on Monday.
Isnt this more a matter for the police?
Jools was found unconscious in his bedroom in April 2022. An inquest into his death found he took his own life. The coroner at the time said it was unlikely he intended to end his life, but the exact events leading up to his death were unclear.
Sounds like the coroner doesn’t really know what happened, so why would the social media access make a difference? Surely if there was anything to find, the police would have found it?
Forensic data of Jools' phone was not gathered at the time and Ms Roome has been asking for access to his social media accounts for more than two years.
Ah. Sounds as though she’d be better off campaigning for better policing to me…
In the early hours an IT engineer raced into work through the dark, wintery streets of Redcar in north-east England. The dash was prompted by a worrying alert about the council's computer network, and he was soon hurriedly shutting down servers to try to halt the spread of a virus. It was too late. Hackers had scrambled Redcar and Cleveland Council's IT systems and would soon demand payment to restore it.
Wow, sounds more exciting than the new ‘Mission Impossible’ movie. I suspect it wasn’t quite like that though….
By 11:00 GMT on Saturday, local residents began to notice the council website was offline. "There wasn't a lot we could do," Mrs Lanigan said about efforts to stop the virus. "You had to be practical, so it was actually getting more phones in there so that people could ring us."
News was spreading, but Mrs Lanigan, who lost her position in the 2023 local elections, claims she received pressure from council officials and central government not to speak out. The council declined to be interviewed about the attack but said there had been no pressure or instruction not to speak publicly, either at the time or since.
Hmm, who to believe?
"It was devastating," she said. "Devastating for us, for the staff, for the public and for everybody else." They had lost the ability to share information with police and the NHS, while social services and elderly care services were knocked out, she said. "Even somebody ringing up and saying 'my bin hasn't been emptied' wasn't dealt with."
And…did anyone think that was unusual? Did anyone actually leap to the conclusion the council had been hacked, or did they just shrug and think ‘Same old council service!’..?
… this is an excerpt:
“It’s an award winning documentary (it won Best of Festival and Best Director at the 2025 Santa Monica International Film Festival) detailing the experiences of the vaccine injured. It opens with a public gathering of the vaccine injured, and a young woman speaking of her experiences, of going from being healthy to disabled. As she tells her story, she shakes uncontrollably due to her vaccine injury.
Numerous personal stories are shown, including of people who were participants in Covid vaccine trials. Maddie de Garay’s story is told – she was, at the outset, a healthy, active 12 year-old, who enrolled in the Pfizer trial with her parents’ permission, but is seen in the documentary in a wheelchair, with a feeding tube in her nose that she relies on, as a result of her rapid descent following her second vaccine.”
Yet the PTB and the greedy privatised medical profession continue to push Big Pharma. Yesterday, a friend wrote about an experience with such a doctor … really pushing, the doctor was, to medicate first, remedicate later, another customer. They themselves are under huge pressure from the cuckoo admin on huge salaries … push it or find another job, be blacklisted.
Quoting leftwing Newsweek
Not a good move. For a start, they run this:
A news source which runs that answers its own question, just like the BBC which replies to an attested piece of evidence with auto “Fact Checking”, which of course results in gainsaying, auto-denial, unsubstantiated, naturally, except by its own sources.
Connected to that is a second strategy called “bluster”, where someone opens with “bollox” or “nope” then makes an assertion, itself unsubstantiated, then using the third strategy … demanding, “Source?” to which any halfway assiduous site replies to look through the site for all references to the matter.
It’s an essentially lazy strategy, demanding ‘source’, employed by one character in the Meredith and Knox case some time back. I was sent a list of 100 questions … you do see the strategy … huge, time intensive delaying … whilst they do zero. Do not respond to such tactics. Because the moment you do, they just auto-nay-say and then a second toerag comes in with the next objection … then a third is posed … tag team.
Which brings me to the fourth strategy of blaming a ‘rogue element’, calling it an ‘isolated case’, ignoring all the antecedent brainwashing which led that person to that place, also ignoring the strategy of agencies having hundreds of assets, sleepers, awaiting the call. I suspect Oswald was ine of those … doubling as a patsy.
A variation on that strategy is a fifth, which combines the second above … the variation being the bold, unsubstantiated assertion … with a variation on the fourth, asserting that you’re the only one on the planet who believes that … you being a quirky whackjob or else you being the embodiment of all wisdom in your own mind.
It plays on this:
On the topic of the early dating of the gospels, one participant in the debate later wrote:
Anyone coming into a debate is coming in from the angle which is the sum of his own experiences to that date … he is therefore quite kind to his own side’s case, making allowances in an easygoing way, letting this one or that go through unchallenged, whilst being narrow of definition and stringent, even pedantic, on anything at all put by the other side … it’s just human nature … as distinct from unethical.
To an actual case … let’s say someone sent an article in which the writer is clearly anti British Empire, putting in big letters that the Chagos Islands were stolen from the people of the islands in the 1960s by the British govt. Uh huh … what about this though:
Puts a slightly different complexion on it, no? Leading to:
We’re now descending into a right rabbithole of international or interbloc law, n’est-ce-pas? Long ago, on the issue of the traitors Heath, Wilson, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, Johnson, Starmer, to name a few, a chap I used to know, named Ian Parker-Joseph, sent me two opposed opinions on the precedence of legal judgments, directly related to sovereignty.
In a perfect example of double or triplespeak, the EU recognised the sovereignty of the nation, whilst simultaneously asserting the primacy of the various extra-national courts, e.g. the ECHR, whilst covering themselves by saying that it was nowt to do wi’them … different other body, mate.
Which is sheer sophistry, as they’re all part of the same bunch, even Gina Miller. They’re all aligned, in cahoots. And that’s before the “World” organisations kick in. Where’s English Common Law in all this?
The analogy I’d use is that of an uneven playing field … let’s say a home side’s playing field, deliberately tampered with to favour the home side, plus movable goalposts.
Solution? The only solution is to be in power, one way or the other. The opposition is always going to change the rules to prevent you ever getting that power back.
Judge Timothy Spencer said Heggs, who has autism and ADHD, was “probably too immature to be working as a police officer” as he jailed him for 12 months.
Actually, he probably ticked two separate boxes!
He said: “It is clear you did not lack enthusiasm and your policing was, at times, of an exemplary standard, but you lacked maturity.
“You had received extensive training, you knew the importance of data protection and knew you should only share materials for a genuine policing purpose.
“You knew the lines were drawn and the lines were very clear.”
It's not something the police should ever expect to have to teach recruits, is it?
Judge Spencer accepted that Heggs’s actions were not out of “wickedness”, but said the defendant’s claims that he accessed the material so he could learn from the experience and become a better officer were “far-fetched”. He said Heggs’s actions had “significantly undermined” public trust and confidence in the police.
As if there’s much left to undermine…
