Positioned to ensure that no result can benefit the people of the land from any angle:
The obvious question is how to stop WEFer and EU communist Starmer before all is lost.
Positioned to ensure that no result can benefit the people of the land from any angle:
The obvious question is how to stop WEFer and EU communist Starmer before all is lost.
Ms Lindsay said: 'I thought that February 28, 2019, when Lewis was attacked, and the three months that followed before he died from his injuries, was the worst period of our lives. 'Little did I know however that that was just the beginning of our nightmare. As victims, we have been treated disgracefully.
Haven't you read about any other cases, that this comes as a surprise to you, then?
'We still do not know why the killer was released 10 days before he attacked Lewis, who made that decision and why, and who is going to be held accountable for it.'
Oh, we do! Nobody in the NHS. Just like all the other cases.
'But as if all that were not bad enough, only six years on, we now get to live knowing that the killer is now allowed out at night-time and will surely be released permanently soon
'What kind of a country is this that we live in where victims of killings are treated like this?'
We live in the sort of country where the people elected to serve the country and keep people safe aren't up to the job, sadly:
The decision to release people on indefinite detention, such as Fleet, is made by the Ministry of Justice, acting on behalf of the Secretary of State Shabana Mahmood.
In fact they can't even control the people who nominally work to them:
Sharon Daniel, Hywel Dda University Health Board's director of nursing, quality and patient experience, has said the board would not be making reports public.
Why not? What have they got to worry about?
While for many, esp. families, it’s about fluffy bunnies and eggs, esp. chocolate, for others just another long weekend … for so many though around the world, not just in Britain nor Europe but in far flung parts of the world … it’s about the rolling away of a stone and its implications.
However, that’s not what this post is solely about. I saw a post by one Brenden Dilley on X which argued that speed is of the essence in America:
I believe @ElonMusk was right when he said that Democrats were importing illegals as a means of having a permanent majority in all swing states.
However, he missed a more sinister underlying reason for doing so... By importing twenty million illegals, they also set up an absurd mission for President Trump to pursue, which is deporting every single one of them. This will not result in making America great again. It will simply make America 2020 again. This is 100% by design. When you have an elite problem solver who is capable of multi-tasking and operating high-level organizational control, the only way to manage that opponent is to control the problems he's focused on solving. Much like Covid-19 derailed the entire Trump agenda in 2020, the invasion is designed to do the same thing. Give Trump and MAGA a false sense of victory over problems the deep state set to eat up time and resources. How do you counter this tactic? The same way you counter all tactics in 2025... speed. The administration must understand that they're solving problems and fighting enemies inside of a prefabricated environment. The real problems and real enemies exist outside of this environment. The only way to escape the environment is to adopt an attitude of permanent offense and permanent speed. Speed allows for mistakes. Speed allows for smaller organizations that don't have the numbers to destroy much larger and well funded institutions. Speed is the great equalizer with information warfare. There are only so many judges. There are only so many Dem leaders, activists, and organizers. Trump must turn the tables and begin dictating terms across multiple war zones and environments. Fire people who can't be fired. Force them to litigate. Mass deport people who can't be deported. Force them to litigate. Cancel hundreds of billions in funding that are not lawful to cancel and force them to litigate. If their strategy is to bog you down in court, saturate the environment in such a way that they don't have enough time and resources to litigate every dramatic action you've taken. Close down agencies. Lock the doors. Seize computers. Send them all home. Force them to litigate. We must begin dictating the battlefield and playing a higher level of war, or we will get victories, but they will only be the ones that our communist opponents allow.
In Britain, we have the opposite imperative … to slow down, bog down, non-cooperate … to make anything Starmer’s trying to do simply unworkable … en masse … plus to wake up to the invasion and its purpose, to disrupt in small ways … cumulatively though, they add up.
Grandad, elder statesman of Scriblerus
He’s put up a post which does not sound too good:
https://headrambles.com/2025/04/18/bad-friday-3
The complication is he cares for his wife of the same vintage who is now quite vulnerable. What is there which is positive? The visiting nurse is a double-edged sword as she is representing official “care” provision … read the post.
There are, or were, daughters … whether any nearby, I don’t know:
There’s one good thing in that we still have this communication channel. I’m fairly out of touch with Grandad at this stage, esp. since the theft of N.O. by a certain platform.
Shall explore possibilities.
Sorry not to be more inventive but hot cross buns are still the order of the day:
The US is revoking the visas of all South Sudanese passport-holders and will stop any more of its citizens entering the country. The Department of State said South Sudan was “taking advantage of the United States” by failing to comply with US efforts to return people to the east African country, adding that the measures would come into effect immediately. “Every country must accept the return of its citizens in a timely manner when another country, including the United States, seeks to remove them,” it said.
Yes, but they don't, so it's about time someone forced them to.
“All visa appointments are cancelled, no new visas will be issued, no existing visas will be effective, and hence NO ONE from South Sudan will be entering the United States on a visa until this matter is resolved,” he said in a social media post.
And will America be poorer for it?
Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, said Washington would “be prepared to “review these actions when South Sudan is in full cooperation”.
Heh! Your move, South Sudan!
In my early rounds this Tuesday morning, I went to Gab to see Julia mainly and there was a notice: UK visitor detected. Whaaaa?
Then the screed from Andrew Torba … entire text reproduced below:
ACCESS RESTRICTED BY PROVIDER
After receiving yet another demand from the UK’s speech police, Ofcom, Gab has made the decision to block the entire United Kingdom from accessing our website.
This latest email from Ofcom ordered us to disclose information about our users and operations. We know where this leads: compelled censorship and British citizens thrown in jail for “hate speech.” We refuse to comply with this tyranny.
Gab is an American company with zero presence in the UK. Ofcom’s demands have no legal force here. To enforce anything in the United States, they’d need to go through a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request or letters rogatory. No U.S. court is going to enforce a foreign censorship regime. The First Amendment forbids it.
Ofcom will likely try to make an example of us anyway. That’s because the UK’s Online Safety Act isn’t about protecting children. It’s about suppressing dissent.
They’re welcome to try. The idea that a British regulator can pressure a U.S. company that’s IP-blocking the entire UK is as farcical as it is futile. If anything, it proves our point: censorship doesn’t work. It only reveals the truth about the censors.
We proudly join platforms like Bitchute in boycotting the United Kingdom. American companies should follow suit. The power of the UK’s parliament ends where the First Amendment begins.
The only way to vote against the tyranny of the UK’s present regime is to walk away from it, refuse to comply, and take refuge under the impervious shelter of the First Amendment.
The UK’s rulers want their people kept in the dark. Let them see how long the public tolerates it as their Internet vanishes, one website at a time.
I’ve posted this at Unherdables plus OoL but shall continue at UHCHQ with details about those particular sites.