Thursday 16 June 2022

Language is their primary weapon

... but it's also mine.

The comment Ray-gun popularised ... that it ain't that Demrats know nothing, it's that they know so much that just ain't true ... is now, sadly, coming home to roost.  A Wokist, or SJW, or formerly leftist, is the shining path example of all that is wrong inside the head.

It's living a perma-undergrad life ... and oh so overweeningly arrogant with it.  Whilst being as thick as pig excrement.  Plus racist and every other ist they dream up.

They're obsessed with language.  Please do not play their game with them.  I saw something about straight pride.  That's just playing their word games.  Look, there's normal and sustainable [another hijacked word] ... and then there is aberration.  That's it.

Wednesday 15 June 2022

Don’t buy a ‘Platinum’ Death Plan, Your Cash is At Risk

 Yet again, a whole segment of a specialised financial industry is allowed to function, from the beginning, without any oversight or Government regulation until a bunch of cowboys virtually does a runner with the cash entrusted to them, and in doing so, a great many elderly people  losing a great deal of money.


As some of you may know my wife died just over a year ago. It was a time of great grief for me, as I tried to assimilate my loss, and keep living at the same time. One task which I took on was to organise my wife Jacqueline’s cremation, as this was something which had to be personally undertaken.


Over the years, I had noted various funeral and cremation plans being marketed, but never really felt urged to do anything about informing myself as to the ins, outs and wherefores of these plans. As I discovered, when first having to research through the field, there is some pretty expensive offerings in the funeral and cremation planning. If one looks ahead, as one approaches the ‘golden years’ of life after retirement: after deciding where to live if you are ‘downsizing’, the expense of a funeral ranks pretty high in the queue of financial decisions you have to make, especially when your hair commences losing it’s colour and shows ever more skeins of grey. 


As I had made no plans for either myself  or my wife, I had to start from scratch. As I do not hold these days with any established religion, and loath the ‘showy’ ideal of a funeral and burial service, peopled with relatives  who never bothered to come near us when we both still lived, and as I believe that when you die, that's it; I decided on a cremation service run by a reputable private company. Once I had made that decision, every small detail was carefully lifted from my shoulders, and the only decisions left for me to make was a choice of favourite music to be played when entering the Crematorium meeting place, and when the coffin is slowly curtained off before the mourning family leave that sad but strangely welcoming place.


But the decision remained for me to decide if I wished a prepaid plan for myself, or to leave it to my family to choose the company which will carry out my cremation. Such thinking drove many thousands of people to view the carefully-choreographed video productions produced by a company with the carefully-chosen and seemingly comforting name of Safe Hands. The company also advertised it’s services on the pages of Financial Times, the Times, and many other reputable newspapers and television stations. 


Safe Hands Funeral Plans guarantee that no matter how long our plan-holders live, or however expensive a funeral is when they pass away, there will never be anything further for those le behind to pay towards the funeral director’s fees and services. In their marketing pamphlet, they talk about their Trust Fund, saying “the money you pay towards your Safe Hands Funeral Plan is held in a secure Trust Fund (via Pitmans Trustees Limited). Set up in conjunction with specialist Trust Solicitors, the fund is independently managed by multinational investment management firm, UBS’. And when they talk about funds, they are talking about big money, but those interested enough were supposed to be reassured by the presence of  Mazars LLP, a top ten UK audit and accounting firm and one of Europe’s largest, appointed to do so by the Trustees, Pitmans Trustees Limited. 


We now see that the funds are in deep trouble. One, TJM Partnership, went into liquidation earlier this year, the other is based in Mauritius, in the Indian Ocean. FRP, the appointed liquidators, are reporting that there is around £3.8 millions secured in the UK, with the bulk of trust assets – more than £60million – are in 'illiquid, high-risk investments', many based in offshore jurisdictions. FRP reckons that most of the depositors’ cash has disappeared.


Safe Hands stated, in their brochure “Because the Trust Fund is entirely independent of the company, in the highly unlikely event that Safe Hands should go into liquidation or cease trading for any reason, because the Trust Fund is not an asset of the company (and because our planholders are the primary beneficiaries of The Trust Fund) your investment would be secure, and would remain ring-fenced specifically for the purpose of providing the funeral you have bought and paid for.”


Time and time again, ordinary people have been fleeced of most if not all of their cash, because once the cash, or cheques, are handed over, there is no-one to look after or defend the ‘little guy’.The Financial Conduct Authority is supposed to have begun overlook of these plans and companies, of which there are many. I was visited myself by one such outfit, who even went as far as ‘recording’ the sales pitch, so he could supposedly be heard as promising nothing untoward, but when it came to the chosen plan, and for me to sign up and arrange to buy a ‘plan’, I baulked at the speed at which things were moving. So this bloke called his boss, and they went into high gear, pushing me to invest what, to me, is a fairly substantial amount of cash, even with a ‘reduced’ deposit, which was thought enough to make the sale. As I can still remember when the vultures were selling kitchens, as well as double-glazed windows, all on the same high pressure ‘get the signature’ ideal, and then you wait, and wait, for your purchase, I decided to just defer the whole thing.


And when researching that same company, whom I will not name, I found the same old pressure selling tactics as the failed firm.


MY advice, if you have the savings, keep them close, and tell your family to buy a simple burial or cremation service, and pay for it then and there. No investments, no platinum packages, your money is never at risk: simples!


And If Anyone's Qualified To Speak On 'Dishonesty'...

Sir Chris Whitty claimed attempts by tobacco lobbyists to make any debate around smoking legislation about health vs freedom are 'dishonest'.
...it's surely him. As Longrider points out.
Under the final must-do plan, doctors should promote vaping to patients as an 'effective tool to help people to quit smoking tobacco'.
'We know vapes are not a "silver bullet" nor are they totally risk-free, but the alternative is far worse,' the review states.

That's if you can actually get to see a GP, of course! 

Cartoons and images on vaping products that appeal to children should be banned and flavours should be reviewed to ensure they don't appeal to young people, the report states.

What sort of flavours don't appeal to young people, then? Semolina? Broccoli? 

Mr Javid told Parliament that the Government 'will now consider its response' to Dr Khan's 'clear and challenging' recommendations. He said the Government is already investing in smoking prevention through a public health grant but 'will examine where we can go further'.

I know where you and your wretched nannying government can go, Sajid... 

We were warned

In an April, 2021 phone conversation direct with the NHS, in which I was hesitating, officially, the girl on the phone asked if it was the bloodclots?  I don't want the girl in trouble but that's at least how early we knew.


Literally everyone was warned, repeatedly, before the vaccines were even made available to the public, and was told that it would be foolish, pointless, and potentially deadly to take them. And although it never made any sense whatsoever to inject one single child with the vaxx, now the stupidity of the fathers and mothers will be visited on millions of those unfortunate children.

So what am I to do when someone official in blogging tells me that to say this is disinformation?  No it's not ... that's what she said. She was a public health official.  Different country of course but that's what was said, even back then.

I lean towards loyalty, even in my scepticism.  I'm not a 'tear it all down', not naturally.  In reaction to demonstrable wrong, yes of course it must be stopped, as Gitler had to be once he mobilised.  But overall, I ask if we can't find an accommodation here.

But in the face of a straightout 'that's disinformation', no it's not.  That's what that girl on the phone told me.

Tuesday 14 June 2022

Why won’t Nancy protect the Supreme Court Judges?

 


The possible plot to change, irrevocably, the USA Supreme Court.

McCarthy Torches Pelosi Following Threat To Kavanaugh’s Life

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK21L…

Monday 13 June 2022

It's Not 'A War On Motorists'...

Sadiq Khan could hike fares for London commuters by as much as 10 per cent from next year, it emerged today - as he was blasted for plans to expand the £12.50-a-day Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez) and introduce pay-per-mile charges for motorists.
...it's the inevitable consequences of the Covid measures on all public finances.
TfL, which Mr Khan oversees, saw its revenues collapse by as much as 95 per cent during the pandemic, and another bailout is needed to cover next April after which the organisation is expected to become 'financially sustainable'.

But almost certainly won't, after the consequences of the inevitable surrender to the rail unions which is surely next on the cards. We know they'll surrender, because it's what everyone in authority seems to do when faced with opposition, these days. 

'It almost feels like the Mayor of London is launching a war against commuters,' Commons Leader Mark Spencer said.

I hate to sound like I'm defending the useless Mayor of London on anything, but if it's a war, your government ordered us all over the top into the range of the enemy's artillery, didn't it? 

Saturday 11 June 2022

The most well-known, dozey, self-centred, wilful, stupid; stupid woman

What do you call someone who enters a place, a country; in the full knowledge that there is no real Rule of Law? 


What do you call someone who enters a place, a country; in the full knowledge that that same country is ruled by Muslim Mullahs, who care little for Western ideas, and even less for simpletons who claim they have DUAL- NATIONALITY? 


What do you call someone who, despite strong advice to the contrary, enters this country, knowing that there is no real protection afforded by a British passport, for the slightly weird notion of ‘Even though I still hold dual Nationality: It’ll be alright; I’ve got a British passport, my daughter has a British passport, and I’m only visiting my mother’? 


What do you call a mother who places her child in real peril by entering a country whereby the Foreign Office advises against all individual travel; warns against banditry, theft and danger to life and liberty if you f**k around with any aspect of their bloody religion, culture, sense of security; or even just plain, ordinary cussedness? 


What do you call a woman who, despite all the official warnings to the contrary, decides that ‘She knows best’; gets on an aircraft with her daughter, and flies in to this pest- and danger-ridden cess-pit?


The real name of this woman? Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe. Her real title? Stupid, silly, bloody woman.


The name of this demi-paradise? Iran, or, to give its exact diplomatic title the Islamic Republic of Iran. The clue to the behaviour of the people who slung this stupid woman into jail? It is in the word ‘ISLAMIC’.


Her husband was quoted as stating :-‘Nazanin is a prisoner of conscience who should never have been jailed in the first place.


“Prisoner of conscience’? Rubbish!  The Iranian mullahs who scrutinise all airport entry lists and visa application lists must have collectively rubbed their hands in glee (or whatever passes for humour in those twisted minds) at the sight of yet another idiot basking in the belief that a foreign passport somehow gives the holder the extra armour against the monolithic Islamic State of Iran’s collective hatred of Western ideas, ideals and very ways of life.


When this loser was finally kicked out of Iran’s prison system, probably because the guards are sick to death of her constant whining, and upon her return to British shores, the first visit of officials should have been from the local Council, to determine if she really is as daft as she makes out to be; because if they are correct, the little girl should be immediately taken into care.


So, five years later, she’s given house arrest because of the virus, and its nearly the end of her sentence. So far, so good.


She was presented with a printed confession at the airport, and she states that the Foreign Office told her to sign it. What actually happened was that the Republican Guards stated that she would not be boarding the flight if she did not sign, and the Consulate official simply told her the truth, which of course was ‘Sign it, or they will revoke your freedom order'.


Upon her release, she immediately began a media blitz against the British Government, stating that it wasn’t her fault that she was arrested, and the blame should be placed on Boris Johnson, for saying she was ‘teaching people about journalism. Nope, she was arrested and held for five-odd years because she was really, really stupid.


Friday 10 June 2022

My Heart Bleeds For Them, Harry...



...the review rightly emphasises that both children had the misfortune to be in the care of exceptionally cruel parents and step-parents.

And the double misfortune of being 'safeguarded' by hopeless incompetents. 

So, why are you urging us to take out an onion for them? You cannot deny they failed at their basic function: 

Social workers never saw Arthur on his own to hear from him what his life was like, and they didn’t get close to Star either...

Why not? And if they didn't, why did they ignore those who did their job for them..? 

Star and Arthur’s other relatives could see their deterioration and made reports, including sending photos and videos of bruising to the children that were, after investigation, regarded by professionals as malicious.

Regarded by them with no apparent attempt to verify that? But it's OK, 'new systems' are needed (not, apparantly, any enquiry into why the existing ones aren't working...)!

...while huge attention is given to the need to create such new systems, the psychological and emotional impact of doing child protection work does not get enough attention.

Wait, what? Do you perhaps mean the huilt and anxiety when you fail so hard at your job that the child is murdered?

No. No, Reader, he doesn't... 

A consistent finding in more than 40 years’ worth of child death inquiry reports is that what appeared to be straightforward tasks, such as sending a photograph to another professional, simply didn’t get done. This requires us to explain the unexplainable – and why, time and time again, well-intentioned professionals can’t explain even to themselves their inaction in the face of evidence of marks and injuries.

Well, would you believe it's because the poor dears are just so oberwhelmed? 

...careful attention must be given to the impact that the stress and anxiety that pervades the work has on professionals’ capacities to think, or not think clearly. 

I cannot fathom how someone could write this without a single twinge of shame. 

12 years of research, based on observing face-to-face encounters between social workers and families, shows that those who fill professionals with the most dread and anxiety are parents hostile to involvement. Faced with threats, intimidation or passive aggression in parents not answering the door, the intense anxiety professionals experience clouds their judgement and makes it extremely difficult to think about and tune in to the children, or to even recognise that they have failed to do so.

Perhaps, then, that term 'professionals' is the wrong one to use?

So what will help them, if all that expensive training won't? Is it more money, perchance? Of course it is.

The more compassion social workers are shown, the more money the government invests and time practitioners are given to think and understand how they are relating to children, the less likely it will be that these tragic deaths will occur in future.

Who should show them 'compassion', Harry? It's not going to be me, I can tell you that! 

Thursday 9 June 2022

NHS - as long as I'm all right, Jack

Not sure about you but I'm in two minds about this:

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/nhs-workers-get-private-healthcare-and-we-pay/

At the weekend Edward Malnick, the Sunday Political Editor, provided a corker, though unfortunately not on the front page. He reported that NHS workers are receiving private health care funded by the taxpayer. 

The data was obtained by Baker Kell Cumming, a political intelligence firm, which revealed overall spending of more than £37million on private occupational health services whose task is to look after NHS employees’ physical and mental health. NHS trusts are using taxpayers’ money to fund medical tests and treatment for staff, while patients languish on record waiting lists.

As one of those non-ostriches not burying his head in the sand or alternatively, not standing in that river in Egypt, as one who is naturally dissident and therefore sees incoming flak before it arrives, something so many readers are also doing, then I comment on the article: 'And what?'  The whole thing's corrupt, innit?  Globo march through the institutions.

At ground level though, for all the poor sods awaiting or enduring treatment, especially those genuinely unable to afford private, it's still an utter disgrace.  It's not that employees are getting private as such, which I see a bit like our soldiery - nothing's too good for them - the point is not that, is it?  The point is we're denied whilst they are getting it.

Why?  Why are they?  Can't help thinking it's to ease their consciences over what med admins are doing to the public, to embroil them in the wrongdoing of the higher ups, to make them share the guilt ... far less likely to whistleblow.

And never forget that elephant in the room ... our esteemed 'guests' from overseas, soon to be dumped on a village near you.