tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6160566690841415782.post173659295721415713..comments2024-03-29T11:12:46.434+00:00Comments on Orphans of Liberty: Lady doctorJames Highamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14525082702330365464noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6160566690841415782.post-83078547128783126332022-08-04T11:56:07.494+01:002022-08-04T11:56:07.494+01:00We are moving inexorably into a matriarchy and I b...We are moving inexorably into a matriarchy and I believe the reason is weak men. This will not end well for our country and just about all Western countries.<br />Just look at the kind of men who infest our public institutions, be it politics, police, medical, the judiciary, education. I can't think of one who I would trust to come to my aid in an emergency.<br />The situation will only improve when we have patriotic white, Christian men in positions of authority.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6160566690841415782.post-7053388769733774422022-08-04T07:39:48.225+01:002022-08-04T07:39:48.225+01:00The issue I have is that in the (imaginary, and pa...The issue I have is that in the (imaginary, and patently fraudulently biased) name of “equality”, women have not only become the majority in certain professions, but that they have been employed whilst … only being able/willing to do a portion of the job.<br /><br />The most skilled, capable and competent Combat Medic I know is a woman, yet I thank The Lord that when I was shot (on foreign fields) it was a male Medic there to treat me, because, no matter how competent, she simply can’t do the really important stuff like, you know, move the patient (either to a safer place, to treat, or to move on to secondary care).<br /><br />In any job you care to mention (ambulance, fire, police, armed forces, medicine – and yes nursing too, as a male nurse you are required to float around the hospital doing all those heavy/hard/difficult jobs ‘the girls’ can’t/wont do) the issue is the same. If you are ‘required’ (by law) to employ women who can/will only do part of a job, you ‘must’ then employ men to do the rest. But … you can’t afford to employ as many men as you would without all that budget being spent on women, so those men end up working much harder, and service provision still falls drastically.<br /><br />In a pure meritocracy, without all the manipulative and fraudulent sexual politics, only the most unusual woman would have ‘any’ job (the whole feminist ideology is based on the patently false premise that those uniquely capable and competent women who ‘made it’ in the professions previously were … representative of the average woman's capabilities and … choices. They weren’t, they really weren’t, they were the one in a billion, seriously unusual, outliers).<br /><br />What we are/have seen in medicine, with the (forced) greater percentage of women making up the profession is that, even with increasing numbers, there is less availability (for the cited reasons), and is merely representative of what is occurring in every job and profession. The experiment (although it was always known this would be the outcome, but they used it to gain power, status and wealth nevertheless) is an abject failure, but … they wont give up on it (and their power/money) without a total collapse. Such is the guaranteed progeny of feminist ‘equality’.<br /><br />I have no issue (in fact support) women’s access to all fields, but just on a level playing field for a change. But … in such a world, almost no woman can compete, and thus they will never, ever accept this simple reality. (and as we watch the collapse, the one other guarantee is that ... it will be 'the mans fault').Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com